Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
18 October 1979

End date
  
October 18, 1979

Citation(s)
  
[1979] 2 NZLR 234

Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson

Full case name
  
Mount Albert Borough Council (First appealant) & Sydney Construction Limited (Second Apeallant) v Constance Ngaroma Johnson (and others)

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Robin Cooke, Baron Cooke of Thorndon, Ivor Richardson, Edward Somers

Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson [1979] 2 NZLR 234 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the Statute of Limitations defence in tort claims.

Contents

Background

Sydney Construction purchased a 3-acre block of land in Mt Albert, with the intention of a residential development. At the time of the sale, the seller had informed Sydney that there was rubbish buried in the land.

Sydney subsequently subdivided the land, and built numerous houses there. On the section that Johnson ultimately purchased, six flats were constructed in 1967.

In 1970, Johnson purchased the flat, and within the year she had noticed subsidence in the building, and as a result she got an engineer to do an inspection.

The engineer did some test drilling, and discovered amongst other rubbish, gib board and motor vehicle parts buried in the foundation, requiring 20 steel poles to be drilled to rectify the subsidence.

Johnson in 1973 sued the council for negligently approving the building permit. Then council filed for Sydney Construction to be made a third party, which Johnson later applied to have Sydney listed as a codefendant.

The High Court awarded Johnson $10,000 in damages.

The Council appealed.

Held

The court dismissed the appeal.

References

Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson Wikipedia