Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Merritt v Merritt

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
27 April 1970

End date
  
April 27, 1970

Merritt v Merritt httpsiytimgcomviJfg5Gd38S4hqdefaultjpg

Citation(s)
  
[1970] EWCA Civ 6, [1970] 1 WLR 1211

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
Balfour v Balfour, Jones v Padavatton, Rose & Frank Co v JR Crom, Carlill v Carbolic Smoke B, Felthouse v Bindley

Merritt v merritt 1970


Merritt v Merritt [1970] EWCA Civ 6 is an English contract law case, on the matter of creating legal relations. While under the principles laid out in Balfour v Balfour, domestic agreements between spouses are rarely legally enforceable, this principle was rebutted where two spouses who formed an agreement over their matrimonial home were not on good terms.

Contents

Merritt v merritt 1970


Facts

Mr. Merritt and his wife jointly owned a house. Mr. Merritt left to live with another woman. They made an agreement (signed) that Mr. Merritt would pay Mrs. Merritt a £40 monthly sum, and eventually transfer the house to her, if Mrs. Merritt kept up the monthly mortgage payments. When the mortgage was paid Mr. Merritt refused to transfer the house.

Judgment

The Court of Appeal held that nature of the dealings, and the fact that the Merritts were separated when they signed their contract, allowed the court to assume that their agreement was more than a domestic arrangement. Lord Denning MR stated:

Widgery LJ and Karminski LJ concurred.

References

Merritt v Merritt Wikipedia