Prior action(s) none Date 13 August 1947 Ruling court High Court of Australia | Subsequent action(s) none Decided 13 August 1947 | |
 | ||
Full case name The Lord Mayor, Councillors and Citizens of the City of Melbourne v The Commonwealth and Another Citation(s) (1947) 74 CLR 31; [1947] HCA 26 Judge(s) sitting Latham CJ, Rich, Starke, Dixon, McTiernan, Williams JJ People also search for Austin v Commonwealth | ||
Melbourne corporation v commonwealth melbourne corporation case 1947 74 clr
Case
Melbourne Corporation v Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 31; [1947] HCA 26 (13 August 1947), also known as the Melbourne Corporation case or the State banking case, is an important case in Australian constitutional law. It stands for the proposition that there are limits on the scope of express Commonwealth legislative powers which can be implied from the federal character of the Constitution.
Contents
- Melbourne corporation v commonwealth melbourne corporation case 1947 74 clr
- Case
- Principle
- Significance
- Recent Developments
- References
Principle
The Melbourne Corporation principle is an implied limit on Commonwealth legislative power under the Constitution of Australia.
The principle renders constitutionally invalid any Commonwealth law that is otherwise valid under a head of power in s51 or some other part of the Constitution if it:
- Places a special burden on the states;
- Which significantly impairs, curtails or weakens the capacity of states or state agencies to exercise their constitutional powers or functions .
Significance
This constitutional protection is one of the few reliable protections in the Australian Constitution against legislative and executive power, the other main protection being the Chapter III Separation of Powers Doctrine.
Recent Developments
A recent case of Austin v Commonwealth (2003) conflated the original 2 limbed test of the original case into an expanded 1st limb so that a commonwealth law that affects a state's ability to administer itself is constitutionally invalid.