Trisha Shetty (Editor)

McKeiver v. Pennsylvania

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citations
  
403 U.S. 528 (more)

Concur/dissent
  
Brennan

Concurrence
  
Harlan

End date
  
1971

Full case name
  
McKeiver v. Pennsylvania

Plurality
  
Blackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, White

Dissent
  
Douglas, joined by Black, Marshall

Similar
  
In re Gault, Roper v Simmons, Graham v Florida, Duncan v Louisiana, New Jersey v T L O

Mckeiver v pennsylvania 403 u s 528 1971


McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. The Court held that juveniles in juvenile criminal proceedings were not entitled to a jury trial by the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendments. The Court's plurality opinion left the precise reasoning for the decision unclear.

Contents

Background

Joseph McKeiver and Edward Terry were teenagers charged with acts of robbery, theft, assault, and escape. Both were denied a request for a jury trial at the Juvenile Court of Philadelphia. A state Superior Court affirmed the order, and, after combining their separate cases in to one case, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the decision stating that there is no constitutional right to a jury trial for juveniles. In similar cases, the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of North Carolina both affirmed the lower court's decision, finding no constitutional requirement for a jury trial for juvenile defendants.

Decision of the Supreme Court

Although the right to a jury trial is not guaranteed by the U.S Constitution in these cases, states may, and some do, employ jury trials in juvenile proceedings if they wish to do so. Kansas is the first state in the U.S. to articulate that the right should be extended to juveniles as a matter of right under its State Constitution.

References

McKeiver v. Pennsylvania Wikipedia