Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Material implication (rule of inference)

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

In propositional logic, material implication is a valid rule of replacement that allows for a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-P or Q and can replace each other in logical proofs.

Contents

P → Q ⇔ ¬ P ∨ Q

Where " ⇔ " is a metalogical symbol representing "can be replaced in a proof with."

Formal notation

The material implication rule may be written in sequent notation:

( P → Q ) ⊢ ( ¬ P ∨ Q )

where ⊢ is a metalogical symbol meaning that ( ¬ P ∨ Q ) is a syntactic consequence of ( P → Q ) in some logical system;

or in rule form:

P → Q ¬ P ∨ Q

where the rule is that wherever an instance of " P → Q " appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with " ¬ P ∨ Q ";

or as the statement of a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

( P → Q ) → ( ¬ P ∨ Q )

where P and Q are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Example

An example is:

If it is a bear, then it can swim.Thus, it is not a bear or it can swim.

where P is the statement "it is a bear" and Q is the statement "it can swim".

If it was found that the bear could not swim, written symbolically as P ∧ ¬ Q , then both sentences are false but otherwise they are both true.

References

Material implication (rule of inference) Wikipedia


Similar Topics
×