Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Material implication (rule of inference)

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

In propositional logic, material implication is a valid rule of replacement that allows for a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-P or Q and can replace each other in logical proofs.

Contents

P Q ¬ P Q

Where " " is a metalogical symbol representing "can be replaced in a proof with."

Formal notation

The material implication rule may be written in sequent notation:

( P Q ) ( ¬ P Q )

where is a metalogical symbol meaning that ( ¬ P Q ) is a syntactic consequence of ( P Q ) in some logical system;

or in rule form:

P Q ¬ P Q

where the rule is that wherever an instance of " P Q " appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with " ¬ P Q ";

or as the statement of a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

( P Q ) ( ¬ P Q )

where P and Q are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Example

An example is:

If it is a bear, then it can swim. Thus, it is not a bear or it can swim.

where P is the statement "it is a bear" and Q is the statement "it can swim".

If it was found that the bear could not swim, written symbolically as P ¬ Q , then both sentences are false but otherwise they are both true.

References

Material implication (rule of inference) Wikipedia