Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Mascall v Mascall

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
Court of Appeal

Citation(s)
  
[1984] EWCA Civ 10, (1984) 50 P&CR 119

Mascall v Mascall [1984] EWCA Civ 10 is an English trusts law case, concerning the requirements of registration and formalities, related to trust law.

Contents

Facts

A father wished to transfer land to his son. He made and gave him a deed of transfer and the land certificate. Then they fell out, and the father changed his mind. The son had not yet gone through with the registration at HM Land Registry. The father argued that it was still his property.

Judgment

Lawton LJ and Browne-Wilkinson LJ gave judgments holding that the property belonged to the son in equity, and was held on trust for the son by the father, because the father had done everything in his power to make the transfer effective. Although without registration, legal title had not passed, title had passed in equity and the father could not take back his agreement.

Sir Denys Buckley concurred.

References

Mascall v Mascall Wikipedia