Suvarna Garge (Editor)

March Construction Ltd v Christchurch City Council

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
20 February 1995

Judge(s) sitting
  
Wlliamson J

Ruling court
  
High Court of New Zealand

Citation(s)
  
(1995) 6 TCLR 394

End date
  
February 20, 1995

March Construction Ltd v Christchurch City Council

Full case name
  
March Construction Ltd v Christchurch City Council

March Construction Ltd v Christchurch City Council (1995) 6 TCLR 394 is a cited case that in general, silence does not constitute misrepresentation in contract.

Contents

Background

March Construction tendered for some from the Christchurch City Council. However, in their tender, their employee entered into their calculations, a sum of $72.75, when they should have used $727.50. This resulted in the unit price being quoted as $250, instead of $968.

After the council had accepted March's tender, the mistake was discovered by March, and they subsequently sought relief from the court. claiming that the councils silence on the mistake, constituted misrepresentation.

Held

The court refused relief, stating the council had no legal obligation to point out to March that they had made a mistake in their tender price.

References

March Construction Ltd v Christchurch City Council Wikipedia