Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Mandla v Dowell Lee

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
24 March 1983

End date
  
March 24, 1983

Prior action(s)
  
[1983] QB 1

Mandla v Dowell-Lee httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Citation(s)
  
[1983] UKHL 7, [1983] 2 AC 548

Judge(s) sitting
  
Lord Fraser of Tullybelton, Lord Edmund-Davies, Lord Roskill, Lord Brandon of Oakbrook and Lord Templeman

Court
  
Judicial functions of the House of Lords

People also search for
  
R (E) v Governing Body of JFS

Mandla v Dowell-Lee [1983] UKHL 7 is a United Kingdom law case on racial discrimination. It held that Sikhs are to be considered an ethnic group for the purposes of the Race Relations Act 1976.

Contents

Facts

A Sikh boy was refused entry to Park Grove School, Birmingham by the headmaster, because his father refused to make him stop wearing a dastar and cut his hair. The boy went to another school, but the father lodged a complaint with the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), which brought the case. Derry Irvine, a future Lord Chancellor, appeared for the CRE.

Court of Appeal

The CRE lost in the Court of Appeal. Lord Denning, M. R. held the following:

He held that Sikhs were not a racial or ethnic group.

House of Lords

The CRE won the Appeal to the House of Lords, where Lord Fraser of Tullybelton held the following.

He went on to approve the test set out by Richardson, J. in the County Court.

They held that Sikhs were a racial or ethnic group.

Significance

The outcome of this case has been that it has led to a legal definition of the term ethno-religious.

References

Mandla v Dowell-Lee Wikipedia