Harman Patil (Editor)

Mahoe Buildings Ltd v Fair Investments Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[1994] 1 NZLR 281

Decided
  
20 July 1993

Mahoe Buildings Ltd v Fair Investments Ltd

Full case name
  
Mahoe Buildings Ltd v Fair Investments Ltd

Judge(s) sitting
  

Mahoe Buildings Ltd v Fair Investments Ltd [1994] 1 NZLR 281 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the doctrine of part performance.

Contents

Background

Mahoe leased a building from Fair Investments. At the end of the 4 years lease, both parties agreed orally to renew the lease.

However, as such leases to be legally enforceable under the Contracts Enforcement Act [1956], they must be in writing, and not merely agreed orally.

Later, one of the parties tried to get out of the lease, on the basis that it was not legally enforceable as the lease renewal was not put in writing.

The other party claimed, that even though it was not put in writing, the lease was still legally enforceable due to the doctrine of part performance.

Held

The court ruled that the doctrine of part performance applied here, making the renewal of the lease legally enforceable.

References

Mahoe Buildings Ltd v Fair Investments Ltd Wikipedia