Magister militum (Latin for "Master of the Soldiers", plural magistri militum) was a top-level military command used in the later Roman Empire, dating from the reign of Constantine. Used alone, the term referred to the senior military officer (equivalent to a war theatre commander, the emperor remaining the supreme commander) of the Empire. In Greek sources, the term is translated either as strategos or as stratelates.
Establishment and development of the office
The title of magister militum was created in the 4th century, when Emperor Constantine the Great deprived the praetorian prefects of their military functions. Initially two posts were created, one as head of the foot troops, as the magister peditum ("Master of the Infantry"), and one for the more prestigious horse troops, the magister equitum ("Master of the Cavalry"). The latter title had existed since Republican times, as the second-in-command to a Roman dictator.
Under Constantine's successors, the title was also established at a territorial level: magistri peditum and magistri equitum were appointed for every praetorian prefecture (per Gallias, per Italiam, per Illyricum, per Orientem), and, in addition, for Thrace and, sometimes, Africa. On occasion, the offices would be combined under a single person, then styled magister equitum et peditum or magister utriusque militiae ("master of both forces").
As such they were directly in command of the local mobile field army of the comitatenses, composed mostly of cavalry, which acted as a rapid reaction force. Other magistri remained at the immediate disposal of the Emperors, and were termed in praesenti ("in the presence" of the Emperor). By the late 4th century, the regional commanders were termed simply magister militum.
In the Western Roman Empire, a "commander-in-chief" evolved with the title of magister utriusque militiae. This powerful office was often the power behind the throne and was held by Stilicho, Flavius Aetius, Ricimer, and others. In the East, there were two senior generals, who were each appointed to the office of magister militum praesentalis.
During the reign of Emperor Justinian I, with increasing military threats and the expansion of the Eastern Empire, three new posts were created: the magister militum per Armeniam in the Armenian and Caucasian provinces, formerly part of the jurisdiction of the magister militum per Orientem, the magister militum per Africam in the reconquered African provinces (534), with a subordinate magister peditum, and the magister militum Spaniae (ca. 562).
In the course of the 6th century, internal and external crises in the provinces often necessitated the temporary union of the supreme regional civil authority with the office of the magister militum. In the establishment of the exarchates of Ravenna and Carthage in 584, this practice found its first permanent expression. Indeed, after the loss of the eastern provinces to the Muslim conquest in the 640s, the surviving field armies and their commanders formed the first themata.
Supreme military commanders sometimes also took this title in early medieval Italy, for example in the Papal States and in Venice, whose Doge claimed to be the successor to the Exarch of Ravenna.
Unspecified commands
383-385/8: Flavius Bauto, magister militum under Valentinian II385/8-394: Arbogast, magister militum under Valentinian II and Eugenius383–388: Andragathiusafter 383-408: Flavius Stilicho422-?: Asterius ? – 480: Ovida411 – 421: Flavius Constantius 422 - 425: Castinus425 - 430: Flavius Constantius Felix 431 - 432: Bonifacius 432 - 433: Sebastianus433 – 454: Flavius Aetius455 - 456: Avitus & Remistus456 – 472: Ricimer472–473: Gundobad475: Ecdicius Avitus475–476: Flavius Orestes352–355: Claudius Silvanus362–364: Flavius Iovinus, magister equitum under Julian and Jovian ? – 419: Flavius Gaudentius425–433: Flavius Aetius435-439: Litorius452–456: Agrippinus456–461: Aegidius461/462: Agrippinus ? - 472: Bilimer441-442: Asterius443: Flavius Merobaudes446: Vitus ?-350: Vetranio, magister peditum under Constans361: Flavius Iovinus, magister equitum under Julian365–375: Equitius, magister utriusquae militiae under Valentinian I395-? Alaric I448/9 Agintheus (known from Priscus of Panium to have held office as the latter's embassy proceeded towards the court of Attila).468–474: Julius Nepos477–479: Onoulphus479–481: Sabinianus Magnus528: Ascum529–530/1: Mundus (1st time)532–536: Mundus (2nd time)c. 538: Justinc. 544: Vitaliusc. 550: John568–569/70: Bonus581–582: Theognisc. 347: Flavius Eusebius, magister utriusquae militiae349–359: Ursicinus, magister equitum under Constantius359–360: Sabinianus, magister equitum under Constantius363–367: Lupicinus, magister equitum under Jovian and Valens371–378: Iulius, magister equitum et Peditum under Valens383: Flavius Richomeres, magister equitum et peditum383–388: Ellebichus, magister equitum et peditum392: Eutherius, magister equitum et peditum393–396: Addaeus, magister equitum et peditum395/400: Fravitta433–446: Anatolius447–451: Zeno460s: Flavius Ardabur Aspar-469: Flavius Iordanes469–471: Zeno483–498: Ioannes Scythac. 503–505: Areobindus Dagalaiphus Areobindus505–506: Pharesmanes ?516-?518: Hypatius ?518–529: Diogenianus520-525/526: Hypatius527: Libelarius527–529: Hypatius529–531: Belisarius531: Mundus532–533: Belisarius540: Buzes542: Belisarius543–544: Martinus549–551: Belisarius555: Amantius556: Valerianus569: Zemarchus572–573: Marcian573: Theodorus574: Eusebius574/574-577: Justinian577–582: Maurice582–583: John Mystacon584-587/588: Philippicus588: Priscus588–589: Philippicus589–591: Comentiolus591–603: Narses603-604 Germanus604-605 Leontius605-610 Domentziolus377–378: Flavius Saturninus, magister equitum under Valens377–378: Traianus, magister peditum under Valens378: Sebastianus, magister peditum under Valens380–383: Flavius Saturninus, magister peditum under Theodosius I392–393: Flavius Stilicho, magister equitum et peditum412–414: Constans441: Ioannes the Vandal, magister utriusque militiae468–474: Armatus474: Heraclius of Edessa511: Hypatius512: Cyril514: Vitalian530–533: Chilbudius550–ca. 554: Artabanes588: Priscus (1st time)593: Priscus (2nd time)593–594: Peter (1st time)594–ca. 598: Priscus (2nd time)598–601: Comentiolus601–602: Peter (2nd time)351–361: Flavius Arbitio, magister equitum under Constantius361–363: Flavius Nevitta, magister equitum under Julian363–379: Victor, magister equitum under Valens366–378: Flavius Arinthaeus, magister peditum under Valens364–369: Flavius Iovinus, magister equitum under Valentinian I364–366: Dagalaifus, magister peditum under Valentinian I367–372: Severus, magister peditum under Valentinian I369–373: Flavius Theodosius, magister equitum under Valentinian I375–388: Merobaudes, magister peditum under Valentinian I, Gratian and Magnus Maximus388-395: Timasius394–408: Flavius Stilicho, magister equitum et peditum399-400: Gainas400: Fravitta409: Varanes and Arsacius419-: Plinta443–451: Apollonius450–451: Anatolius475-477/478: Armatus485–: Longinus492–499: John the Hunchback518–520: Vitalian 520–?: Justinian 528: Leontius528-529: Phocas520-538/9: Sittas536: Germanus536: Maxentianus546–548: Artabanes548/9–552: Suartuas562: Constantinianus (uncertain)582: Germanus (uncertain)585–ca. 586: Comentiolus626: Bonus (uncertain)373–375: Flavius Theodosius, magister equitum 386–398: Gildo, magister equitum et peditum534–536: Solomon536–539: Germanus539–544: Solomon544–546: Sergius545–546: Areobindus546: Artabanes546–552: John Troglita578–590: Gennadius8th century: Marcellus737: Domenico Leoni under Leo III the Isaurian738: Felice Cornicola under Leo III the Isaurian739: Theodatus Hypatus under Leo III the Isaurian741: Ioannes Fabriacius under Leo III the Isaurian764–787: Mauricius GalbaBy the 12th century, the term was being used to describe a man who organized the military force of a political or feudal leader on his behalf. In the Gesta Herwardi, the hero is several times described as magister militum by the man who translated the original Early English account into Latin. It seems possible that the writer of the original version, now lost, thought of him as the 'hereward' – the supervisor of the military force. That this later use of these terms was based on the classical concept seems clear.