Neha Patil (Editor)

Lumley v Gye

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
Queen's Bench

Lumley v Gye httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Citation(s)
  
[1853] EWHC QB J73, (1853) 118 ER 749, (1853) 2 Ellis and Blackburn 216

Similar
  
Lumley v Wagner, Quinn v Leathem, Torquay Hotel Co Ltd v Cou, Mogul Steamship Co Ltd v, Crofter Hand Woven H

Lumley v gye case note summary


Lumley v Gye [1853] EWHC QB J73 is a foundational English tort law case, heard in 1853, in the field of economic tort. It held that one may claim damages from a third person who interferes in the performance of a contract by another.

Contents

Arising out of the same facts is also Lumley v Wagner, where Mr Lumley successfully secured an injunction from Ms Wagner against performing for Mr Gye further.

The nonperformance lumley v wagner lumley v gye


Facts

The singer Johanna Wagner was engaged by Benjamin Lumley to sing exclusively at Her Majesty's Theatre for three months. Frederick Gye, who ran Covent Garden Theatre, induced her to break her contract with Mr. Lumley by promising to pay her more. Although an injunction was issued to prevent her singing at Covent Garden, Gye persuaded her to disregard it. Lumley therefore sued Gye for damages in respect of the income he had lost.

Judgment

Crompton J held that Lumley could claim damages from Gye. He observed that although the general law is there is no action, by then it had become clear that a claim lay for wrongfully and maliciously enticing a person to break their contract with another.

Wightman J and Erle J concurred.

References

Lumley v Gye Wikipedia


Similar Topics