Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Liebherr Export AG v Ellison Trading Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
29 June 2004

Location
  
New Zealand

End date
  
June 29, 2004

Liebherr Export AG v Ellison Trading Ltd

Full case name
  
LIEBHERR EXPORT - AG First Appellant AND LIEBHERR AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED Second Appellant v ELLISON TRADING LIMITED Respondent

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Judge(s) sitting
  
Glazebrook J, Chisholm J, Gendall J

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Liebherr Export AG v Ellison Trading Ltd is a New Zealand legal case regarding certainty in contract formation.

Contents

Background

Ellison Trading was the sole New Zealand distributor of machinery for Liebherr Export since 1977. In November 1993, suddenly informed Ellison during a dinner that Liebherr Australia was taking over the New Zealand distributorship.

Besides just being advised that he had just lost their business, the Liebherr Australia representative also informed them that they did not want to buy back any of the $800,000 in Liebherr parts that Ellison was contracted under the distribution agreement.

The Liebherr AG representative thought this was unfair, and last got Liebherr Australia to agree to purchase the parts back at a "fair and reasonable" price.

Liebherr Australia subsequently negotiations with Ellison to purchase their stock, but talks broke down after Liebherr wanted to offer less than cost price, as well as excluding from purchase a lot of the stock.

Liebherr eventually walked away, claiming they had no legal obligation to purchase the stock.

A less than impressed Ellison sued Liebherr under the agreement to purchase the stock, which Liebherr defended that they denied even making the offer to purchase, and if they did, they claimed that the term "fair and reasonable", lacked certaincy and therefore making such a contract not legally enforceable.

The High Court ruled in favour of Ellison, and Liebherr appealed.

Held

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal agreeing with the High Court that Liebherr did agree to purchase the stock, and that the term "fair and reasonable" could be remedied by the courts if the parties could not come to an agreed price.

References

Liebherr Export AG v Ellison Trading Ltd Wikipedia