Girish Mahajan (Editor)

Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Similar
  
Sherwood v Walker, Kirksey v Kirksey, Wood v Lucy - Lady Duff‑Gordon, Hamer v Sidway, Lucy v Zehmer

Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly, 331 N.W.2d 203 (1982) is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan. It used a risk of loss analysis to justify the denial of recission as a contract remedy despite the presence of mutual mistake.

Contents

Facts

The Pickles bought a 600-square-foot (56 m2) three unit dwelling for use as a rental property from the Messerly's, only to discover that an illegal septic system had contaminated the ground. Pickles sought recission and Messerly sought a deficiency judgment.

Judgment

The Supreme Court of Michigan backed away from the precedent of Sherwood v. Walker in favor of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, and relied on an "as is" clause in the land contract to deny recission.

References

Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly Wikipedia