Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Konsumentombudsmannen v Gourmet AB

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
(2001) C-405/98

Ruling court
  
European Court of Justice

End date
  
2001

Similar
  
Walter Rau Lebensmittelwerke v De Sme, Schmidberger v Austria, Commission v France (1997), Commission v Germany (1987), Procureur du Roi v BenoƮt an

Konsumentombudsmannen v Gourmet AB (2001) C-405/98 is an EU law case, concerning the free movement of goods in the European Union.

Contents

Facts

Sweden banned ads for alcohol on the radio, TV and in magazines totally. Sweden argued the measure was lawful because there had been a constant increase in wine sales, mostly imports, so the ad ban could not be having a disparate impact in fact on importers.

Advocate General Jacobs

AG Jacobs highlighted that Swedish producers dominated the strong beer market. This was shown by Gourmet's statistics. Ingrained consumer habits would favour national beer.

Court of Justice

The Court of Justice held the law infringed art 34 but it could be justified on public health grounds if it was proportionate. The ban having an effect on cross-border supply of advertising space breached TFEU art 56 on free movement of services, but this could again be justified on grounds of public health.

References

Konsumentombudsmannen v Gourmet AB Wikipedia