Kirsten v Bailey

In Kirsten v Bailey, an important case in the South African law of succession, the testatrix made three wills. In the first and the third, Bailey was nominated as the sole beneficiary of her estate; in the second will Kirsten was nominated as the sole beneficiary. Kirsten challenged the validity of the third will. The court held that Bailey had led the testatrix to believe that he would leave her unless she appointed him her sole heir. Thus Kirsten had proved that the testatrix was unduly influenced and accordingly lacked the requisite capacity. Thus, the testatrix was held to have died intestate. The intestate heirs happened to be the beneficiaries nominated in the second will. If the court declares the last in a series of wills to be invalid ab initio, the deceased is deemed to have died intestate. The court will not give effect to an earlier will, as it has already been revoked.