Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Hyde v Wrench

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
Decided
  
8 December 1840

End date
  
December 8, 1840

Full case name
  
Hyde v Wrench

Judge(s) sitting
  
Lord Langdale

Hyde v Wrench httpsiytimgcomviW3pf5eVxIhqdefaultjpg

Citation(s)
  
[1840] EWHC Ch J90, [1840] 3 Bea 334, [1840] 49 ER 132

Similar
  
Felthouse v Bindley, Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhove, Adams v Lindsell, Fisher v Bell, Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp

Contract law hyde v wrench


Hyde v Wrench [1840] EWHC Ch J90 is a leading English contract law case on the issue of counter-offers and their relation to initial offers. In it Lord Langdale ruled that any counter-offer cancels the original offer.

Contents

Facts

Wrench offered to sell his farm in Luddenham to Hyde for £1200, an offer which Hyde declined. On 6 June 1840 Wrench wrote to Hyde's agent offering to sell the farm for £1000, stating that it was the final offer and that he would not alter from it. Hyde offered £950 in his letter by 8 June, and after examining the offer Wrench refused to accept, and informed Hyde of this on 27 June. On the 29th Hyde agreed to buy the farm for £1000 without any additional agreement from Wrench, and after Wrench refused to sell the farm to him he sued for breach of contract.

Judgment

Lord Langdale's judgment read:

Under the circumstances stated in this bill, I think there exists no valid binding contract between the parties for the purchase of this property. The defendant offered to sell it for £1000, and if that had been at once unconditionally there would undoubtedly have been a perfect binding contract; instead of that, the plaintiff made an offer of his own, to purchase the property for £950, and he thereby rejected the offer previously made by the defendant. I think that it was not afterwards competent for him to revive the proposal of the defendant, by tendering an acceptance of it; and that, therefore, there exists no obligation of any sort between the parties.

References

Hyde v Wrench Wikipedia


Similar Topics