Subsequent history Reversed and remanded. | End date 1938 | |
Full case name Joe Hale v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Citations 303 U.S. 613 (more)58 S.Ct. 753; 82 L.Ed. 1050 Similar Snyder v Louisiana, Edmonson v Leesville Concrete, Foster v Chatman, Miller‑El v Dretke, Hernandez v Texas | ||
Hale v. Kentucky, 303 U.S. 613 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case relating to racial discrimination in the selection of juries for criminal trials. The case overturned the conviction of an African American man accused of murder because the lower court of Kentucky had systematically excluded African Americans from serving on the jury in the case. NAACP counsel, including Charles H. Houston, Leon A. Ransom and Thurgood Marshall, represented Hale.
Contents
Background
Joe Hale, an African American, had been convicted in McCracken County, Kentucky. No African Americans were selected as jury members within the previous 50 years although nearly 7,000 were eligible for jury service.
Ruling
The court unanimously ruled that the plaintiff's civil rights had been violated.
Results
Hale v. Kentucky was one in a series of cases where the Supreme Court overturned convictions of blacks for reason of discrimination in jury selections in the lower courts.