Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Guaranty Trust Co. v. York

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
End date
  
1945

Full case name
  
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York

Citations
  
326 U.S. 99 (more) 65 S. Ct. 1464; 89 L. Ed. 2079; 1945 U.S. LEXIS 2665; 160 A.L.R. 1231

Prior history
  
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Majority
  
Frankfurter, joined by Stone, Black, Reed, Jackson

Dissent
  
Rutledge, joined by Murphy

Ruling court
  
Supreme Court of the United States

Similar
  
Erie Railroad Co v To, Pennoyer v Neff, Burnham v Superior Court of

Guaranty Trust Co. v. York, 326 U.S. 99 (1945), was a United States Supreme Court case that described how federal courts were to follow state law. Justice Frankfurter delivered the majority opinion further refining the doctrine set forth in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins.

Contents

Background

The Erie Doctrine, adopted in 1938, held that while Federal law was determinative in procedural matters, state law should control for substantive matters, thus preventing 'forum shopping' between state and Federal courts. The defendant in Guaranty Trust argued that the plaintiff's action was time-barred under a New York statute of limitations. The plaintiff countered that the relevant statute of limitations was "procedural," was not "substantive" law, and therefore was not within the ambit of the doctrine established in the Erie case.

Decision of the Court

The court dispensed with this substantive/procedural distinction and stated that regardless of whether the case was argued in state or federal court, the outcome should be substantially the same. Thus, the court set forth an "outcome determinative test" for deciding whether a piece of state law must be obeyed in federal courts—if the outcome is substantively the same then the federal court can apply its own rules instead of state rules. The court held in this case that the New York Statute of limitations be obeyed and the case was reversed and remanded.

This rule was refined first in Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. and subsequently defined more specifically in a related series of cases over the next few decades.

References

Guaranty Trust Co. v. York Wikipedia