Gowers norm

Definition

Let f be a complex-valued function on a finite Abelian group G and let J denote complex conjugation. The Gowers d-norm is

Gowers norms are also defined for complex valued functions f on a segment [N]={0,1,2,...,N-1}, where N is a positive integer. In this context, the uniformity norm is given as ∥ f ∥ U d [ N ] = ∥ f ~ ∥ U d ( Z / N ~ Z ) / ∥ 1 [ N ] ∥ U d ( Z / N ~ Z ) , where N ~ is a large integer, 1 [ N ] denotes the indicator function of [N], and f ~ ( x ) is equal to f ( x ) for x ∈ [ N ] and 0 for all other x . This definition does not depend on N ~ , as long as N ~ > 2 d N .

Inverse conjectures

An inverse conjecture for these norms is a statement asserting that if a bounded function f has a large Gowers d-norm then f correlates with a polynomial phase of degree d-1 or other object with polynomial behaviour (e.g. a (d-1)-step nilsequence). The precise statement depends on the Gowers norm under consideration.

The Inverse Conjecture for vector spaces over a finite field F asserts that for any δ > 0 there exists a constant c > 0 such that for any finite dimensional vector space V over F and any complex valued function f on V , bounded by 1, such that ∥ f ∥ U d [ V ] ≥ δ , there exists a polynomial sequence P : V → R / Z such that

where e ( x ) := e 2 π i x . This conjecture was proved to be true by Bergelson, Tao, and Ziegler.

The Inverse Conjecture for Gowers U d [ N ] norm asserts that for any δ > 0 , a finite collection of (d-1)-step nilmanifolds M δ and constants c , C can be found, so that the following is true. If N is a positive integer and f : [ N ] → C is bounded in absolute value by 1 and ∥ f ∥ U d [ N ] ≥ δ , then there exists a nilmanifold G / Γ ∈ M δ and a nilsequence F ( g n x ) where g ∈ G ,   x ∈ G / Γ and F : G / Γ → C bounded by 1 in absolute value and with Lipschitz constant bounded by C such that:

This conjecture was proved to be true by Green, Tao, and Ziegler. It should be stressed that the appearance of nilsequences in the above statement is necessary. The statement is no longer true if we only consider polynomial phases.