Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Going to Tehran

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
7.8
/
10
1
Votes
Alchetron
7.8
1 Ratings
100
90
80
71
60
50
40
30
20
10
Rate This

Rate This

Language
  
English

ISBN
  
978-1250043535

Page count
  
496

3.9/5
Goodreads

Pages
  
496

Originally published
  
8 January 2013

Going to Tehran t3gstaticcomimagesqtbnANd9GcQ2MrfSPHwPiRsehS

Editor
  
Henry Holt and Company Inc

Authors
  
Hillary Mann Leverett, Flynt Leverett

Similar
  
The Ayatollahs' Democra, Inheriting Syria, The Iranians, Islamic Government: Governan

Flynt leverett going to tehran conversations from penn state


Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic (Persian: عزیمت به تهران‎‎) is a book by Flynt Leverett, former senior fellow at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., and his wife Hillary Mann Leverett. It was first published in 2013. The premise of Going to Tehran is that the United States must develop its relationship with Iran in a similar manner to that of its relationship with China in the early 1970s at the time of Nixon and Kissinger.

Contents

Authors

Flynt Leverett (born March 6, 1958, in Memphis, Tennessee) is a former senior fellow at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C. and a professor at the Pennsylvania State University School of International Affairs. His wife Hillary Mann Leverett is a visiting scholar at Georgetown University and Peking University, and a senior fellow at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China. Both authors are former American national security officials.

Context

Going to Tehran is based on an analysis of the "Grand strategy of Iran" and the role of negotiating with the United States. According to expert opinion in Washington, Iran's nuclear program had to achieve the same situation that existed in Japan, Canada and other threshold nuclear states; there is the capability of reaching nuclear capability but Iran is not allowed.

Reviews

According to The New York Times, the authors of Going to Tehran gave up the idea of realist attitude of American about obviously partisan stance. In this book, the domestic and foreign policy of Iran has been considered as an acceptable view. According to the concluding pages, the issues between Iran and America cannot be resolved by isolating, strangling, bombarding, dislodging or waiting for Iran to fall. The American government must consider the Islamic Republic of Iran a strategic partner and both countries have to reach an agreement on controversial issues. For representing the history of relations between America and Iran, this book has a unilateral view and is a collection of confidential documents from the time of the Iran–Iraq War. At the end of the book, the author state by example how political planes create a negative view of Iran.

The basic idea of Going to Tehran is that the United States must developed its relationship with Iran in the same manner it did with the People's Republic of China in the early 1970s at the time of Nixon and Kissinger.

Due to the ideas of the authors, the United States is required to come to an agreement with the Islamic Republic, not to safeguarding the interests of Iran but to stabilize its strategic position in the Middle East and to avoid conflict.

References

Going to Tehran Wikipedia