Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Geary v Rankine

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Court
  
Court of Appeal

Citation(s)
  
[2012] EWCA Civ 555

Decided
  
29 March 2012

End date
  
March 29, 2012

Geary v Rankine

Judge(s) sitting
  
Lewison LJ, Etherton LJ, Thorpe LJ

Similar
  
Jones v Kernott, Stack v Dowden, Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset

Geary v Rankine [2012] EWCA Civ 555 is an English land law case, concerning constructive trusts, and the establishment of a beneficial interest in the family home.

Contents

Facts

Mrs Geary and Mr Rankine had been in a relationship since 1990. In 1996, Rankine purchased a guest house with his own savings. The parties had not intended to live in the property or run it themselves; instead having it run by a manager. Difficulties with the manager lead Rankine to run the business himself. He realised that he could not run it alone and Geary became involved in the business, cleaning, cooking and looking after guests. Rankine did not pay Geary wages, and she asked for money when she needed it. The relationship deteriorated, Geary brought a claim for an interest in the guest house based on a business partnership or a constructive trust.

Judgment

At first instance, the Judge rejected Geary's claim; and Geary appealed.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the legal title was solely in Rankine's name and so the burden of establishing a constructive trust was on Geary. The relevant question was whether there was a common intention for Geary to have a beneficial interest in the property, applying Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, which must be determined objectively from the parties' conduct. Geary had shown there was a common intention to run the business together, but it was not correct to therefore reach a conclusion of a common intention that the property in which the business was run, bought by only one of them, would now belong to both of them. The judge at first instance had not erred in concluding there was no constructive trust.

Lewison LJ said the following.

References

Geary v Rankine Wikipedia