Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Garratt v Ikeda

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
13 September 2001

Location
  
New Zealand

Citation(s)
  
[2002] 1 NZLR 577

End date
  
September 13, 2001

Garratt v Ikeda

Full case name
  
CLIVE CHARLES GARRATT Appellant v KOZO IKEDA Respondent

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Judge sittings
  
Andrew Tipping, Peter Blanchard, John McGrath

Garratt v Ikeda [2002] 1 NZLR 577 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding where a contract is cancelled under the Contractual Remedies Act 1979, if the deposit has not been paid, it is still payable, despite section 8(3)(a).

Contents

Background

Garratt agreed to purchase Ikeda's property for $1.83 million, with a 10% deposit, payable in 3 instalments.

After paying the first two instalments totaling $50,000, Garratt defaulted on the final $130,000 payment due on the deposit. As a result, Ikeda cancelled the sale, and resold the property to another party for $400,000 more than Garratt had agreed to purchase the property.

With the sale now cancelled, Garratt requested Ikeda to refund the $50,000 he had paid on the deposit. Ikeda refused, despite the fact that he had resold the property for a $400,000 profit.

Garratt eventually sued for his deposit back.

Held

The court ruled that section 8(3)(a) did not apply here, as the deposit was a performed obligation at the date of the cancellation. Relief under section 9 for the $400,0000 resale profit, was also refused.

References

Garratt v Ikeda Wikipedia