Puneet Varma (Editor)

Frampton v McCully

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Frampton v McCully

Citation(s)
  
[1976] 1 NZLR 270

Decided
  
21 October 1975

End date
  
October 21, 1975

Frampton v McCully

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Clifford Richmond, Robin Cooke, Baron Cooke of Thorndon

Frampton v McCully [1976] 1 NZLR 270 is a New Zealand case cited regarding whether a contract that is subject to one parties solicitor's approval and whether such approval can be with held for non conveyancing matters.

Contents

Background

McCully entered in a conditional sale agreement with Moir for a trust property, with the condition being subject to the approval of the trust's solicitor (and trustee) Mr Frampton. The approval was not limited to just conveyancing matters. Mr Frampton subsequently refused to give approval for the sale, for non conveyancing reasons. McCully claimed that solicitors approval was only allowed to be with held for conveyancy matters.

Held

The Court of Appeal ruled that as the sales agreement was clearly a conditional offer, and as that condition was never met, there was no legally binding contract between the parties.

References

Frampton v McCully Wikipedia