Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd v Electricity Corp of New Zealand Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
10 October 2001

End date
  
October 10, 2001

Citation(s)
  
[2002] 2 NZLR 433

Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd v Electricity Corp of New Zealand Ltd

Full case name
  
ELECTRICITY CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant v FLETCHER CHALLENGE ENERGY LIMITED Respondent

Transcript(s)
  
Court of Appeal judgment

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Judge sittings
  
Ivor Richardson, Clarence Thomas, Kenneth Keith, Peter Blanchard, John McGrath

Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd v Electricity Corporation of New Zealand Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 433 regarding certainty in contract formation.

Contents

Background

Western Mining Corporation was selling it's 40% stake in the Kupe gas field, for which Fletcher Challenge Energy and Electricity Corporation were interesting in buying. ECNZ was particularly interested as it was planning to convert the Huntly power station with gas.

Both companies entered into an agreement that if one of them purchased the WMC share, that they would split the gas between them.

The contract was called a Heads of Agreement (HoA), but it left several matters unresolved, "to use all reasonable endeavors to agree to a full sale and purchase agreement within 3 months of the date of this agreement".

Later however, after a substantial drop in power prices, ECNZ decided to not convert the power plant.

As a result, FCE applied successfully to the High Court to make ECNZ enter into an agreement with them. ECNZ defended the issue on the basis that there was lack of certaincy making the contract unenforceable.

Held

The court of appeal ruled that there was not a legally binding contract

References

Fletcher Challenge Energy Ltd v Electricity Corp of New Zealand Ltd Wikipedia