Built 1853-54 Designated NHL November 7, 1973 Opened 1853 Added to NRHP 7 November 1973 | NRHP Reference # 73001685 Designated NHLDCP October 9, 1960 Architectural style American Exotic Revival | |
 | ||
Location 141 E. Bay St., Charleston, South Carolina Part of Charleston Historic District (#66000964) Address 141 E Bay St, Charleston, SC 29401, USA Architects Francis D. Lee, Edward C. Jones Similar Clark Mills Studio, Dubose Heyward House, Old Marine Hospital, Colonel John Stuart House, Simmons‑Edwards House | ||
The Farmers' and Exchange Bank is a historic commercial building at 141 East Bay Street in Charleston, South Carolina. Built in 1853-54, it is an architecturally distinctive building, with Moorish Revival features rarely seen in the United States. The building is recognizable for its use of muqarnas—characteristic of Persian and North African architecture—as well as its large arched windows and striking red sandstone facade. It was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1973.
Description and history
The Farmers' and Exchange Bank is located on the west side of East Bay Street in the Charleston Historic District. It is a two-story masonry structure, built out of brick and multiple shades of brownstone, with stucco finish. Its main facade is three bays wide, each bay taken up by a tall arched opening with Moorish features. The first floor openings have a contoured shape, with circular windows above entries with intricately carved doors. The second-floor openings are similar, with the upper circular portion having a scalloped edge, and the arches filled with large multi-pane fixed windows.
The building was designed by Edward C. Jones and Francis D. Lee, both Charleston architects, and was completed in 1854. Its design is probably based on depictions of Moorish architecture published in Washington Irving's The Alhambra, which was published around that time. It was for some time thought to have been influenced by the Regency architecture of Great Britain, specifically the "Hindu" influence of buildings of that period such as the Royal Pavilion in Brighton, but the architects have been judged unlikely to have been exposed to such influences.