Neha Patil (Editor)

Environment America

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Location
  
Boston, Massachusetts

Founded
  
2007

Expenses
  
7.875 million USD

Fields
  
Environmentalism

Revenue
  
8.892 million USD

Type of business
  
501(c)(4)

Environment America wwwenvironmentamericacenterorgsitesenvironment

Key people
  
Margie Alt, Ana Aurilio

Website
  
www.environmentamerica.org

Similar
  
Fund for the Public Interest, Public Interest Research, League of Conservation Voters, Environment California, Environmental Action

Profiles

Environment America is a federation of liberal state-based environmental advocacy organizations in the United States. The organization researches and advocates for environmental policies through lobbying and the mobilization of public support. Environment America advocates new laws and policies to address climate change, and is a proponent of clean energy. It opposes offshore drilling.

Contents

History

On November 5, 2007, Environment America separated from the state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRG) and announced its intent to take control of the organization's national environmental advocacy program. The federation combined several small, state-based advocacy groups that had separated from the U.S. PIRGs earlier in the year. As a result of the separation of the organizations, the PIRGs’ scope of work was defined as consumer and social justice issues while Environment America became responsible for the group’s previous environmental work.

National work

Environment America works to publicize and gain support for controversial environmental challenges in the United States. Their areas of interest include the use of renewable energy sources, climate change, water pollution, air pollution, fossil fuel dependency, environmental conservation, and offshore drilling. The organization releases reports on topics such as wind energy policy, the presence of mercury in contaminated fish, companies’ compliance to the Clean Water Act, energy efficient buildings, extreme weather in the U.S., precipitation rates, fuel efficient cars, and levels of carcinogens in waterways.

The organization has sought to influence the nation's environmental stance through politics. Environment America publishes an annual scorecard of members of the U.S. Congress based on how they voted on environmental issues in that year's session. Members of the Democratic Party typically score higher than members of the Republican Party on the scorecard. In 2009, Environment America reviewed more than 100 environmental policies adopted by states in previous years. The organization has endorsed candidates during national elections. In 2008 and 2012, they joined the Sierra Club, League of Conservation Voters and Clean Water Action in endorsing Barack Obama’s reelection to office.

Besides supporting political candidates, Environment America and the Sierra Club have worked together on various environmental efforts. These joint efforts include supporting the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act in 2007, opposing amendments to the Climate Security Act in 2008, supporting the EPA's proposal for a fuel economy label, supporting the National Ocean Policy in 2010, and opposing the bill H.R. 850 and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme Prohibition Act of 2011.

In 2012, Environment America contributed $550,000 to Fair Share Action, an independent expenditure committee established by Tim Gill. The group conducted get-out-the-vote efforts in support of President Barack Obama during his 2012 reelection campaign.

State work

Environment America has 29 state affiliates, including Environment California and Environment Oregon.

Environment California

Environment California has supported environmental campaigns within California including statewide bans on plastic bags, the reduction of energy inefficient appliances, and the expansion of the state's solar metering program and solar energy production. The advocacy group has also worked to reform California’s renewable energy policies. Environment California supported a law that Governor Jerry Brown signed in 2011 which mandated that 33% of the state's energy must come from renewable sources by 2020, an increase from the previous requirement of 20%.

Environment California released reports on the energy consumption of public schools, solar projects on school campuses, Californian cities' solar power production, "green job" training programs within the state, and the costs of fossil fuels.

Environment Texas

In 2009, Environment Texas and the Sierra Club filed similar lawsuits against Chevron Phillips for alleged violations of pollution limits and the Shell Oil Company for alleged illegal air pollution emissions. Shell Oil Company agreed to pay a $5.8 million settlement, reduce emissions from its Deer Park refinery by 80%, upgrade chemical units, and reduce gas flaring. The following year, the environmental groups sued the largest oil refinery in the United States, Exxon Mobil, accusing it of violating the Clean Air Act through the release of emissions from refineries and chemical plants in the Texas Gulf coast.

PennEnvironment

PennEnvironment has released several reports that analyze environmental concerns in Pennsylvania including counties' recycling fees, the dumping of toxic chemicals by industrial facilities into the state’s waterways, and the building of roads and logging in the Allegheny National Forrest. Another report released by the state affiliate found that power plants fueled by coal in the state release large amounts of pollution that contribute to unhealthy smog and put susceptible populations at risk. In 2011, PennEnvironment condemned the government's decision to reject stricter air pollution regulations that would diminish ground-level ozone, the main component of harmful smog.

In 2012, PennEnvironment, along with the Sierra Club, sued PPG Industries for the contamination of lagoons and a solid waste landfill at the company's Ford City site near the Allegheny River which resulted from the disposal of glass polishing waste. Chemical testing revealed high levels of arsenic, lead, antimony, iron and chromium at the site. The environmental groups claimed that the company violated the Clean Water Act and Resources Conservation and Recovery Act and failed to follow an administrative order issued by the DEP under the Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law to clean up the site in 2009.

References

Environment America Wikipedia