Dynamic carrier control (DCC) is a method of reducing power consumption in radio transmitters during periods of low audio activity or silence. It is a type of Modulation-Dependent Carrier Level control, or MDCL. All modern high-power (>50 kW) shortwave radio transmitters incorporate DCC of some kind, as well as some mediumwave (MW) transmitters.
Contents
- History
- MDCL methods
- Advantages and disadvantages of MDCL methods
- Operational use
- Transmitters using DCC
- Possible future obsolescence
- References
DCC causes the carrier wave level to be automatically reduced when the audio is very weak or no audio is present. During periods of silence (no audio), the carrier power is reduced by 50%, so the 250 kW transmitter is putting out a carrier of 125 kW during audio pauses. This carrier power reduction saves electricity.
History
This amplitude modulation (and vestigial SSB modulation) energy-saving mode was devised in the late 1930s. DCC was not implemented in transmitter designs until the 1980s, because of some of the complexities of the control circuit.
MDCL methods
There are two types of Modulation-Dependent Carrier Level (MDCL) control methods: DCC, as discussed above, and Amplitude Modulation Companding (AMC), developed by the BBC. The AMC design achieves the opposite effect of the original DCC system: the carrier is at maximum when no audio is present, and is reduced by up to 75% when the audio is loudest. The system uses the carrier to quieten the channel when no audio is present, while still realizing power savings. Both DCC and AMC have been a staple in European MW broadcasting for many years, and now AMC is now being used by stations in North America.
Both the above MDCL methods (DDC and AMC) can be used simultaneously if desired. Some stations choose a mixture of DCC and AMC which uses a complex carrier vs. modulation curve, typically running less carrier for modulation in the 25% to 75% range, and with more carrier during peaks and pauses.
DCC can work with frequency modulation (FM), but was never adopted for high-power FM stereo transmission.
Advantages and disadvantages of MDCL methods
The main reason for using either MDCL method (or the combination of the two) is to save power and money. Alternatively, for the same total power consumption, the transmission coverage can be somewhat improved. The AMC method has two other advantages. It limits the peak voltages on transmitter and antenna circuits, possibly preventing damaging arcs. Also, if the degree of AMC is properly adjusted, the power drawn from the mains can be kept nearly constant with modulation. This is especially important when operating from a local generator. With conventional DCC the load variations on a generator are made worse. With both methods, the main disadvantage is marginal loss of coverage, comparable to running slightly less power. Also in lower signal strength parts of the coverage area, a station using Dynamic Carrier Control may be more likely to be skipped on digital-tuned radios during seek/scan tuning (if the frequency is passed during carrier reduction), an issue compounded by manual tuning (instead of seek/scan) selection not being easy on some receivers.
Operational use
When running a transmitter with DCC, these settings are recommended to optimize power savings versus the listener's receiver "signal lock" loss.
Occasional misuses of DCC
Transmitters using DCC
Here is a list of manufacturers that offer DCC in their transmitters:
Possible future obsolescence
Digital transmissions such as used with Digital Radio Mondiale have a constant power level even during program pauses and once they replace standard analogue amplitude modulated signals, will make DCC unnecessary for audio broadcasting via shortwave. However, some of the same circuits used for DCC also make it easy to adjust the power level when operating in the digital mode. DRM signals use only a fraction of the power to achieve the same coverage as an AM transmitter, so the cost savings feature of DCC will not be needed.
According to the ITU Radio Regulations, Geneva 1990, Article 4.