Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
31 January 1969

End date
  
January 31, 1969

Citation(s)
  
[1969] 2 QB 158

Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson, Edgington v Fitzmaurice, Long v Lloyd, Derry v Peek, Howard Marine and Dredging

Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] 2 QB 158 is an English contract law case concerning misrepresentation. It establishes the different measure of damages between breach of contract and deceit.

Contents

Facts

Mr Herbert Doyle bought a business from Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd at 12, Upper High Street, Epsom, Surrey. Mr Doyle was told the business was ‘all over the counter’. Really, half the shop's business came through a travelling salesman. Mr Doyle made heavy losses. The judge awarded £1500 in deceit, based on two and a half times the cost of employing a part-time traveller at £600 a year, as equivalent to the cost of making good the representation or the reduction in the value of the goodwill. Mr Doyle appealed.

Judgment

Lord Denning MR increased the damages to £5500. He said Mr Doyle could claim for all damage flowing directly from the deceit which was not rendered too remote by Mr Doyle's own conduct, whether or not the defendants could have foreseen such consequential loss. The plaintiff's position before the fraudulent inducement should be compared with his position at the end of the transaction. He said damages for fraud and conspiracy are differently assessed from those for breach of contract,

References

Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd Wikipedia


Similar Topics