Docket nos. 13–1032 Concurrence Kennedy End date March 3, 2015 | Citations 575 U.S. ___ (more) Location United States of America | |
Full case name Direct Marketing Association, Petitioner v. Barbara Brohl, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Revenue Majority Thomas, joined by unanimous Concurrence Ginsburg, joined by Breyer; Sotomayor (in part) Similar Quill Corp v North Dakota, Alabama Legislative Black Ca, City of Los Angeles v Patel, Heien v North Carolina, Michigan v EPA | ||
Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, 575 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a lawsuit by the Direct Marketing Association trade group about a Colorado law regarding reporting the state's tax requirements to customers and to the Colorado Department of Revenue is not barred by the Tax Injunction Act.
Opinion of the Court
In a unanimous decision, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas held that "the relief sought by petitioner [Direct Marketing Association] would not 'enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection' of Colorado's sales and use taxes."
References
Direct Marketing Ass'n v. Brohl Wikipedia(Text) CC BY-SA