Docket nos. 09-1533 Argument Oral argument | Citations 564 U.S. 70 (more) End date 2011 | |
Full case name Frantz DePierre, Petitioner v. United States Prior history conviction affirmed, 599 F.3d 25 (1st Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 562 U. S. ___ (2010) Majority Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan; Scalia (except part III–A) Similar Bullcoming v New Mexico, J D B v North Carolina, Bond v United States, AT&T Mobility LLC v Co | ||
Depierre v united states oral argument february 28 2011
DePierre v. United States, 564 U.S. 70 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the use of the term "cocaine base" in 21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1) refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form. The decision of the Court was unanimous, except with respect to part III-A.
Contents
Background
A federal court found Frantz DePierre guilty of distributing cocaine in April 2008. Additional, DePierre was found guilty of distributing more than 50 grams of "cocaine base, which carries a 10-year minimum sentence." Following this conviction, DePierre was sentenced to10 years in a federal prison followed by 5 years of supervised release. Two years later, the US Court of Appeals upheld the sentencing,
Question Before the Court
Does the term "cocaine base" cover a broad spectrum of cocaine defined chemically as a base, or is the term specifically limited to the use and distribution of "crack" cocaine?
Decision of the Court
In a unanimous decision, Justice Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court defining cocaine base as not just crack cocaine, but any substance that contains "cocaine in its chemically basic form."
Concurring Opinion
Justice Scalia wrote a brief, humorous concurring opinion arguing that the Court's look into legislative history is unneeded and potentially harmful.