Harman Patil (Editor)

Comparison of instant messaging clients

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Android
  
5.0.021_RC15 / January 19, 2017; 43 days ago (2017-01-19)

iOS
  
5.0 / January 12, 2017; 50 days ago (2017-01-12)

The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of instant messaging clients. Please see the individual products' articles for further information. External links may lead to extensions that add a feature to a client.

Contents

Operating system support

The operating systems the clients can run on without emulation or compatibility layers.

Features

Information on what features each of clients support.

Messengers with client-to-client encryption

The following table is an overview of instant messaging clients that provide end-to-end encryption. Some of the listed client applications do not provide end-to-end encryption by default. These clients may require that users install a separate plugin, turn on a setting, or use an optional mode. In these cases, the encryption-related information in this table is only applicable when the encryption is enabled.

Messengers with client-to-server encryption

The following table is an overview of those Instant Messenger clients which provide client-to-server encryption. It does not include clients that also provide end-to-end encryption.

Messengers with no encryption

The following is a list of those Instant Messenger clients which do not provide client-to-server encryption:

  • Empathy
  • ICQ
  • Mxit
  • Nimbuzz
  • Palringo
  • Windows Live Messenger
  • Xfire
  • Notes

    References

    Comparison of instant messaging clients Wikipedia