Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Commutativity of conjunction

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit

In propositional logic, the commutativity of conjunction is a valid argument form and truth-functional tautology. It is considered to be a law of classical logic. It is the principle that the conjuncts of a logical conjunction may switch places with each other, while preserving the truth-value of the resulting proposition.

Contents

Formal notation

Commutativity of conjunction can be expressed in sequent notation as:

( P ∧ Q ) ⊢ ( Q ∧ P )

and

( Q ∧ P ) ⊢ ( P ∧ Q )

where ⊢ is a metalogical symbol meaning that ( Q ∧ P ) is a syntactic consequence of ( P ∧ Q ) , in the one case, and ( P ∧ Q ) is a syntactic consequence of ( Q ∧ P ) in the other, in some logical system;

or in rule form:

P ∧ Q ∴ Q ∧ P

and

Q ∧ P ∴ P ∧ Q

where the rule is that wherever an instance of " ( P ∧ Q ) " appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with " ( Q ∧ P ) " and wherever an instance of " ( Q ∧ P ) " appears on a line of a proof, it can be replaced with " ( P ∧ Q ) ";

or as the statement of a truth-functional tautology or theorem of propositional logic:

( P ∧ Q ) → ( Q ∧ P )

and

( Q ∧ P ) → ( P ∧ Q )

where P and Q are propositions expressed in some formal system.

Generalized principle

For any propositions H1, H2, ... Hn, and permutation σ(n) of the numbers 1 through n, it is the case that:

H1 ∧ H2 ∧ ... ∧ Hn

is equivalent to

Hσ(1) ∧ Hσ(2) ∧ Hσ(n).

For example, if H1 is

It is raining

H2 is

Socrates is mortal

and H3 is

2+2=4

then

It is raining and Socrates is mortal and 2+2=4

is equivalent to

Socrates is mortal and 2+2=4 and it is raining

and the other orderings of the predicates.

References

Commutativity of conjunction Wikipedia


Similar Topics
×