Nationality British Field Middle Ages | Fields Medieval history | |
Born 16 January 1877
Arnesby ( 1877-01-16 ) Institutions St John's College, Cambridge Known for The Cambridge Medieval History Died 11 March 1947, Cambridge, United Kingdom Alma mater St John's College, Cambridge Institution St John's College, Cambridge Books The Study of Medieval History: A, The Early History of the Hous, Political Satire in English P, Cambridge Medieval History - S | ||
Charles william previt orton
Charles William Previté-Orton (16 January 1877 – 11 March 1947) was a medieval historian and the first Professor of Medieval History at the University of Cambridge on the establishment of the position in 1937.
Contents
Life
Previté-Orton was born on 16 January 1877 in Arnesby in Leicestershire. After losing an eye at the age of 14, he was not sufficiently well to attend university until 1905 at the age of 28. A scholar of St John's College, Cambridge, he was placed in the first class of each part of the history tripos and was elected a fellow of his college in 1911, where he remained for the duration of his life. From 1925-38 he was editor of the English Historical Review; he was elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 1929 and was appointed as Cambridge's first Professor of Medieval History in 1937, holding the position until 1942. He died on 11 March 1947.
Previté-Orton's major work, in conjunction with Zachary Nugent Brooke, was to oversee as editor the later volumes of the eight volume Cambridge Medieval History, completed in 1937. However, he achieved his greatest historical influence among general readers rather than scholars through his three general textbooks, Outlines of Medieval History (1916), Methuens textbook A History of Europe, 1198–1378 (1937), and the posthumously published Shorter Cambridge Medieval History (2 vols., 1952).
According to Barrie Dobson, who would some four decades later succeed to the chair of Medieval history at Cambridge, "in the opinion of those who knew him personally, as a scholar Previté was lucid and accurate but passionless rather than original. As an editor, however, he was critical, shrewd, painstaking, and generous: few scholars made so sustained a contribution to the reputation of medieval studies at Cambridge during the first half of the twentieth century."