Harman Patil (Editor)

Catley v Herbert

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Full case name
  
Catley v Herbert

Citation(s)
  
[1988] 1 NZLR 606

Decided
  
14 August 1988

End date
  
August 14, 1988

Catley v Herbert

Judge(s) sitting
  
Richardson, Somers and Hardie Boys JJ

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of New Zealand

Catley v Herbert [1988] 1 NZLR 606 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether a contract illegal under law, can be subsequently validated under the Illegal Contracts Act 1970.

Contents

Background

Catley and Herbert were joint shareholders in a company, and had agreed that Herbert would buyout Catley's shares. This sale entailed the selling of some of the company property in order to purchase his shares. Unfortunately, the law saw this as financing the purchase of a company's own shares, which was illegal under section 62 of the Companies Act 1950.

As a result, Herbert refused to pay Catley, on the basis that to do so would be illegal. Catley sought validation of the contract in the court.

Held

Validation of the contract was ordered.

Footnote: This case is often discussed with NZI Bank Ltd v Euro-National Corp Ltd [1992] 3 NZLR 528, where a similar transaction that also contravened section 62(1) was not validated

References

Catley v Herbert Wikipedia