Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Cassidy v Ministry of Health

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[1951] 2 KB 343, [1951] 1 All ER 574

Court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
Ready Mixed Concrete, O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc, Carmichael v National Power plc, Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gar, James v Greenwich LBC

Cassidy v ministry of health 1951 2 kb 343 1 all er 574


Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 is an English tort law and UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights.

Contents

Facts

Mr Cassidy went to hospital for a routine operation on his hand, but came away with stiff fingers because of the negligence of one of the doctors. He attempted to sue the Ministry of Health in its capacity as employer. The Ministry argued it could not be held responsible and had no vicarious liability, relying partly on Collins v Hertfordshire where it had been suggested that a surgeon was not the 'servant' of his employer.

Judgment

The Court of Appeal held that the doctor was indeed a servant of the hospital and the Ministry was vicariously liable, because the doctor was integrated into the health organisation. Denning LJ said,

He also noted, that where a patient selects the doctor, then the doctor will not be employed by a hospital.

References

Cassidy v Ministry of Health Wikipedia