Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Decided
  
26 March 2002

End date
  
March 26, 2002

British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Citation(s)
  
[2002] EWCA Civ 494, [2002] IRLR 480

Court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Judge sittings
  
Richard Buxton, Peter Gibson, David Neuberger, Baron Neuberger of Abbotsbury

People also search for
  
Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright

British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue [2002] EWCA Civ 494 is a UK labour law case regarding the National Minimum Wage Act 1998.

Contents

Facts

Workers were staying at home overnight, and would answer telephone queries. In between they could read or watch television. The employers argued that r 15(1) draws a distinction between work at home and work at an employer’s workplace, so when the worker was not working at home he should not be paid.

Judgment

Buxton LJ held the workers were "working" even when on call, because ‘the alternative that is apparently contended for by the appellant, that the employees are only working when they are actually dealing with phone calls with all the periods spent waiting for calls excluded, would, in my view effectively make a mockery of the whole system of the minimum wage.’ Buxton LJ's judgment read as follows.

Peter Gibson LJ and Neuberger J agreed.

References

British Nursing Association v Inland Revenue Wikipedia