The Bluffton Movement was spawned during a political rally held under the "Secession Oak" in the village of Bluffton, South Carolina, on July 31, 1844. The movement was an attempt to invoke "separate state action" against the tariff of 1842, after John Calhoun's failure to secure the presidential nomination and the Northern Democrats' abandonment of the South on the tariff had apparently destroyed hope for relief within the Democratic Party. Though many of the "Blufftonites" undoubtedly contemplated disunion, the object of their leader, Robert Barnwell Rhett, seems rather to have been a "reform" of the Union giving further safeguards to Southern interests. The movement collapsed within a short time, largely through its repudiation by Calhoun.
Contents
Origins
The impetus for the Bluffton movement was the passing in congress of the tariff of 1842, a protectionist tariff that enraged southern planters. The tariff raised the amount of dutiable goods as well as the rate of taxation on all goods, and resulted in a sharp decrease in international trade. This proved to be beneficial to northern industrialists, who no longer had to worry about competition from overseas, but greatly hurt southern planters who relied on international markets for their products. The inequity of the tariff, as well as the fact that it was in direct contrast to the Compromise of 1833, which was passed to insure that southerners would not have to face high protectionist tax rates, caused massive unrest in the south. A second, equally important motivation for the movement was the debate over the annexation of Texas. Southerners were adamant that Texas be admitted as a slave state of the union, while northern abolitionists insisted that another slave state could not be admitted. Southerners feared that if this were allowed to pass, their institution of slavery would be doomed and England would add Texas to its empire. Both of these outcomes were unacceptable to southern democrats. While southerners agreed that action needed to be taken, the correct course of action was unclear, and politicians in South Carolina, the most radical state, squabbled over how to effectively stand up to the south. Influential South Carolina statesman, Senator John C. Calhoun had hoped to gain a presidential nomination from the southern Democratic Party on the principles of annexation and nullification of the tariff of 1842 and no compromises. While Calhoun felt strongly about the injustices of the tariff and abolition, he also was against separate state action and insisted that the south must act together to stand strong against the north. His strong stance was too much for the rest of the party, and he failed to secure the nomination and James K. Polk was nominated. While some southerners and South Carolinians rejoiced that Polk was the answer to their problems, many were not so optimistic. A group known as the “regency” or the “clique” led by congressman Rhett called for immediate state action and gained followers in Rhett’s constituencies. The movement came to a head in Bluffton when several hundred prominent young planters and followers of Rhett gathered under a large oak tree, which came to be known as the “secession oak.” Rhett declared that there was no hope for the south’s interest and that nothing would be gained by the election of Polk to the presidency. He proclaimed that the only hope for the south as they knew it was for immediate nullification of the tariff, or secession of South Carolina. He insisted that once South Carolina took action others would follow, and called for a state convention as soon as the next congress was finished, to resolve these issues. To conclude his revolutionary speech, Rhett raised his glass and said, “may it be as useful as the convention of 1776.”(Bluffton Breeze Arts)
Outcome
Immediately following the speech under the oak tree, the “Bluffton Boys” had some momentum. Many South Carolinians supported Rhett and were not content to sit back and hope for Polk to answer their prayers. A Rhett-sponsored South Carolina newspaper, The Charleston Mercury, urged readers to take action against the “two enormous villainies” (abolitionism and the tariff). It denounced these as “cohesive, cooperative, concurrent, kindred and co-essential atrocities,”(Boucher 19) and implored that if action was not taken, then the south would lose everything. Many in South Carolina reluctantly agreed with Rhett, and several anti-tariff associations were formed which wanted to consider more moderate courses of action first, but feared that separate state action might very well be the only way to secure what they saw as their basic rights.
Aftermath
While Rhett proclaimed that he was still a friend of Calhoun’s and would continue to work for the southern Democratic Party to ensure the election of Polk, many suspected his ambition to rally supporters and ultimately supplant Calhoun. His movement lost momentum when it was denounced by Calhoun and on August 19, 1844 a convention of Charleston democrats was held to hold the Bluffton movement in check. They were embarrassed and concerned by the radical actions of Rhett and feared that the movement would endanger the election of Polk, which democrats still considered essential. Resolutions were made that affirmed the full support of Polk, denied of any disunity in the state, and declared that the state was not ready for separate state action. This stymied the momentum of the Bluffton movement and by the first of October of the same year, the movement was over. While the movement itself was short-lived, it raised the issue of secession and was the beginning of an attitude that ultimately led to the confederacy, and the civil war.