Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Bettini v Gye

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
(1876) 1 QBD 183

Court
  
Queen's Bench

Bettini v Gye httpsuploadwikimediaorgwikipediacommonsthu

Judge(s) sitting
  
Blackburn J, Quain J and Archibald J

Similar
  
Poussard v Spiers and Pond, Hong Kong Fir Shipping, L'Estrange v F Graucob, The Moorcock, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams

Bettini v Gye (1876) 1 QBD 183 is an English contract law case, concerning the right to terminate performance of a contract.

Contents

Facts

The tenor Alessandro Bettini agreed with Frederick Gye that he would not sing anywhere within fifty miles of London except at the Royal Italian Opera, Covent Garden (now the Royal Opera House), from 1 January to 1 December, and would perform for him from 30 March to 13 July 1875 for £150 per month. Bettini was supposed to perform concerts or operas. Importantly, Bettini was meant to be in London ‘without fail’ 6 days before rehearsals, but did not arrive until 28 March, at which point he was ready to perform. However, Gye rejected Bettini’s performance.

Judgment

Blackburn J held the provision for arriving 6 days before was not a condition, and therefore breach of it did not give rise to the right to terminate. If clear words had stipulated that in the event Mr Bettini did not show up Gye could terminate, or that Bettini would forfeit twice his salary, that would provide the answer. Here Bettini had already performed his covenant to not sing in the UK in the months running up to 30 March, and not showing for rehearsals could only affect theatrical performances and singing in duets during the first week or fortnight. So the breach did not go to the root of the contract, and Gye was not entitled to terminate.

References

Bettini v Gye Wikipedia