Kalpana Kalpana (Editor)

Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon

Citation(s)
  
[1987] AC 45n, [1986] 3 WLR 414, [1986] 3 All ER 468

Prior action(s)
  
(7 November 1983) Unreported, Bingham J

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Similar
  
Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional, DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tow, Adams v Cape Industries, Ord v Belhaven Pubs Ltd, Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby

Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon [1987] AC 45n is a conflict of laws case, which also relates to UK company law and piercing the corporate veil.

Contents

Facts

The Bank of Tokyo was a Japanese Bank operating in London and a wholly owned subsidiary the Bank of Tokyo Trust Co, a New York corporation. Mr Karoon, an Iranian employee of the Iranian Martime Co had personal accounts with both banks. He left Iran and transferred his money from the New York to the London bank. In February 1980 the London bank was notified that Mr Karoon was sentenced to prison by the Iranian government, and requested his assets be sent to the Iranian government. Mr Karoon asked the bank to transfer his accounts to another bank. The bank, unsure of what to do, applied for an interpleader summons and the money was eventually paid into court. Mr Karoon sued the New York bank claiming breach of the duty of confidentiality in disclosing information to the London bank, and the London bank sought to restrain him taking proceedings in the American courts.

Judgment

Robert Goff LJ held that it was for American law, as the forum conveniens, to determine whether a Bank of Tokyo Trust Co had committed a breach of contract, observing that it was a separate corporation from Bank of Tokyo. There were no reasons of public policy which required an injunction.

In the course of his judgment Robert Goff LJ observed,

References

Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon Wikipedia