Suvarna Garge (Editor)

Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Citation(s)
  
[2001] EWCA Civ 712

End date
  
May 17, 2001

Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc

Full case name
  
Bairstow & Others v Queen's Moat Houses Plc

Decided
  
May 17, 2001 (2001-05-17)

Ruling court
  
Court of Appeal of England and Wales

Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses Plc [2001] EWCA Civ 712 is a UK company law case concerning shares.

Contents

Facts

Counsel argued that directors should be liable for unlawful distributions even when the company was solvent.

Judgment

Robert Walker LJ held that the idea that investors were getting a windfall was wrong. However it may be possible that in suing the directors, an equitable contribution from shareholders could be payable. That argument was not, however, raised here.

Sedley LJ concurred.

References

Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc Wikipedia