Rahul Sharma (Editor)

Arsenault Cameron v Prince Edward Island

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket No.
  
26682

Docket number
  
26,682

Ruling
  
Appeal allowed.

Arsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward Island

Full case name
  
Noëlla Arsenault-Cameron, Madeleine Costa-Petitpas and the Fédération des Parents de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard Inc. v. The Government of Prince Edward Island

Citations
  
[2000] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2000 SCC 1

Prior history
  
Judgment for the Government of Prince Edward Island in the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island, Appeal Division.

Unanimous reasons by
  
Major and Bastarache JJ.

People also search for
  
Doucet-Boudreau v Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), Mahe v Alberta, R v Beaulac, R v S (RD)

Arsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2000 SCC 1, is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on minority language rights. The Court found that the numbers of Francophone children in Summerside, Prince Edward Island warranted French language education in Summerside, under section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the province was constitutionally obligated to create a French language school.

Contents

Background

A number of Francophone families living in Summerside made a request to the French Language Board to build a French language school in the community rather than bus the children to the closest French school 57 minutes away. The Board made a proposal to the Minister which was rejected.

The family applied for a declaration against the province to build a school in Summerside. At trial the declaration was granted but was overturned on appeal.

In the decision of Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 851, prior to the language rights hearing, the counsel for the government sought to have Bastarache recuse himself for reasonable apprehension of bias due to his history of championing the French language. In an application to Bastarache, he held that he was not biased to hear the case, and so did not recuse himself.

Opinion of the Court

Major and Bastarache, writing for a unanimous court, applied a purposive interpretation to section 23 of the Charter. He found that the purpose of the right is to redress past injustices and provide "an official language minority with equal access to high quality education in its own language in circumstances where community development will be enhanced."

References

Arsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward Island Wikipedia