Puneet Varma

Aronson v. Lewis

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Location  Delaware, United States
Citation(s)  473 A 2d 805 (Del 1984)
Similar  Zapata Corp v Maldonado, In re Caremark Internatio, Guth v Loft Inc, In re Citigroup Inc Shar, In re Oracle Corp Derivativ

Aronson v Lewis 473 A 2d 805 (Del 1984) is a US corporate law case, from Delaware concerning the possibility of a shareholder to bring a derivative suit.



A shareholder claimed that the directors of Meyers Parking System Inc. had improperly wasted corporate assets. The CEO, Mr Fink, then 75 years old, was also a 47% shareholder and its founder. It was alleged he personally selected the other directors. They had given to Mr Fink a generous five year employment contract, a subsequent term as a consultant with a large salary, and an annual bonus equal to 5% of the company’s pre tax profits. The contract also said that this continued regardless of Mr Fink’s continued ability to perform the job.


Justice Moore rejected the claim on the ground that the plaintiff had not shown that making a demand on the board would have been futile. He held that the ‘business judgment rule’ was applicable. This meant,


Aronson v. Lewis Wikipedia

Similar Topics
Zapata Corp v Maldonado
Bedrooms (film)
Retour à Gorée