7.6 /10 1 Votes7.6
Originally published 2011 | 3.8/5 Goodreads | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Similar Stasiland: Oh Wasn't it so Terri, The Dressmaker, The Story of a New Name, Foal's Bread, Past the Shallows | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All That I Am is Australian novelist Anna Funder's first fictional work. It follows characters affected by the Nazi regime in pre-war Germany and Britain.
Contents
The book was first published in 2011 by Penguin Books.
Plot summary
A young Ruth Becker meets and marries a leading journalist, Hans Wesemann, while visiting her cousin Dora in Munich in 1923. Together they participate in left wing activism. Ten years later, as Hitler becomes Chancellor of Germany, Ruth and Hans, together with Dora and her lover, playwright Ernst Toller, are forced to flee to London. In exile in London, always in danger of being deported by the British Government, they dedicate themselves to making the world realise how dangerous Hitler really is. The storytelling shifts from the point of view of Toller shortly before his suicide in New York in 1939, and the sole survivor Ruth in Melbourne in 2001.
All of the characters in All That I Am are real people, however Funder has reconstructed their stories, as a lot of the memories and moments that compel the story cannot be verified. In her notes Funder writes: "I have made connections and suppositions, for that I take full responsibility."
Characters
Critical reception
All That I Am garnered generally positive reviews and a slew of awards. David Marr said that "In language of admirable simplicity she explores the shadowy ambiguities lurking in her characters – ambiguities that have always fascinated her: the good that comes with bad and the bad with good." Miriam Borthwick said "It is a riveting portrayal of real people's lives lived in terrible circumstances." The Guardian, while generally praising the work was conscious and somewhat wary of the literary reconstruction of real events, concluding that it was "a studiously researched fantasy about the past that stages an almost self-annihilating debate about reconstruction."