Samiksha Jaiswal

A v Bottrill

Updated on
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Court  Privy Council
Citation(s)  [2002] UKPC 44
Decided  06 September 2002
End date  September 6, 2002
A v Bottrill
Full case name  “A” Appellant v Michael Bernard Bottrill Respondent
Transcript(s)  High Court judgment PC judgment
Judge sittings  Donald Nicholls, Baron Nicholls of Birkenhead

A v Bottrill [2002] UKPC 44 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the awarding of exemplary damages.

Contents

Background

Dr Bottrill was a pathologist in Gisborne. Due to his negligence, he misread A's slides for cervical cancer, resulting in her delaying her treatment.

Barred by ACC law from pursuing Bottrill in court for ordinary damages for her suffering, A instead sued him for exemplary damages, which is a far higher standard to meet.

Her High Court claim in 1999 was dismissed, as well as her subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Decision

The Privy Council upheld her appeal, and referred the matter back to court. The appeal was helped by new evidence of Dr Bottrill's negligence.

Footnote: Subsequent to her 1999 claim being dismissed, it was discovered that Bottrill had misread numerous other people's slides, causing a national uproar, resulting in a Commission of Inquiry.

References

A v Bottrill Wikipedia


Similar Topics
The Karnival Kid
Rúben Brígido
Adrian McPherson
Topics