Girish Mahajan (Editor)

WIC Radio Ltd v Simpson

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Ruling
  
Appeal succeeded

Date argued
  
2008

WIC Radio Ltd v Simpson

Full case name
  
WIC Radio Ltd and Rafe Mair, Appellants v Kari Simpson, Respondent, with Canadian Civil Liberties Association, British Columbia, Civil Liberties Association and Canadian Newspaper Association, Ad IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers Association, British Columbia Association of Broadcasters, RTNDA Canada/Association of Electronic Journalists, Canadian Publishers' Council, Magazines Canada, Canadian Association of Journalists and Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (Collectively "Media Coalition"), Interveners

Unanimous reasons by
  
Binnie, William Ian Corneil

People also search for
  
Grant v Torstar Corp, Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto, Edmonton Journal v Alberta (AG)

WIC Radio Ltd v Simpson (2008) is a case on appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia to the Supreme Court of Canada on defamation.

After CKNW radio talk show host Rafe Mair broadcast an editorial that compared family rights activist Kari Simpson to Adolf Hitler, the Ku Klux Klan, and former Alabama governor George Wallace, among others, Simpson sued Mair and his employer, WIC Radio Ltd., for defamation.

A 2006 B.C. Court of Appeal decision written by then-justice Mary Southin, concluded that Mair defamed Simpson and couldn't rely on the defence of fair comment. In 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Mair had, in fact, defamed Simpson. However, the Supreme Court used this case to re-define defamation in Canada. Because the old legal test no longer applied, the Supreme Court found for the appellants Mair and WIC Radio Ltd.

The Supreme Court decision was regarded as likely to encourage public commentators to be more brave in criticizing public figures.

References

WIC Radio Ltd v Simpson Wikipedia


Similar Topics