Majority Gray | Date decided 1891 | |
Full case name Union Pacific Railway Company v. Botsford Citations 141 U.S. 250 (more)
11 S. Ct. 1000; 35 L. Ed. 734 Dissent Brewer, joined by Brown Similar Schloendorff v Society of New Y, Cruzan v Director - Missouri, Griswold v Connecticut, Katz v United States, Terry v Ohio | ||
Union Pacific Railway Company v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250 (1891) was a case before the United States Supreme Court.
A railroad passenger sustained permanent injuries to her brain and spinal cord. She sued the railroad for negligence in the construction of the railroad car which allegedly caused her injuries. The Union Pacific Railway Company claimed that it was entitled, without her consent, to an opportunity to surgically examine her to determine her diagnosis and the extent of her injuries.
The court disagreed, holding that there was no authority under the common law or statutory law for the trial court to order such an examination: "No right is held more sacred or is more carefully guarded by the common law than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law."