Supriya Ghosh (Editor)

Ulmus × viminalis 'Betulaefolia'

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Higher classification
  
Ulmus minor 'Plotii'

Rank
  
Cultivar

Hybrid parentage
  
U. minor × U. minor 'Plotii'

Ulmus × viminalis 'Betulaefolia' (:'birch-leaved') is a hybrid cultivar believed to be derived from the crossing U. minor × U. minor 'Plotii'. It was listed by Loddiges of Hackney, London, in the catalogue of 1836, and later by Loudon in Arboretum et Fruticetum Britannicum (1838), as U. campestris var. betulaefolia. Melville considered the tree so named at Kew a form of U. × viminalis. Loudon and Browne had noted that some forms of U. × viminalis can be mistaken for a variety of birch.

Contents

Henry (1913) described an U. nitens var. betulaefolia, a cultivar with long, narrow un-birchlike leaves, a specimen of which from Audley End, Suffolk, is preserved at Kew (see External links below). Henry did not include this cultivar among forms of U. × viminalis, but both he and Green took it to be a synonym of Loudon's 'Betulaefolia'. Melville determined this tree a triple hybrid, U. carpinifolia gled. × U. plotii Druce × U. glabra Huds..

Description

Loudon's U. campestris var. betulaefolia was distinguished by its leaves "somewhat resembling common birch".

Henry's U. nitens var. betulaefolia was "a pyramidal tree with ascending branches, with leaves up to 4 in. by 1.5 in., long-acuminate at the apex and narrowing towards a cuneate but unequal base".

Pests and diseases

Trees of the U. × viminalis group are very susceptible to Dutch elm disease.

Cultivation

No specimens of U. × viminalis labelled 'Betulaefolia' are known to survive.

References

Ulmus × viminalis 'Betulaefolia' Wikipedia