7.8 /10 1 Votes
Country United States Media type Print (Paperback) Subject New Left | 3.9/5 Goodreads Language English Originally published 1971 Publisher New American Library OCLC 39281836 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication date 1971 (1st edition)
1975 (2nd edition)
1999 (retitled edition) ISBN 0-452-01184-1 (retitled edition) Pages 204 (1st edition); 239 (2nd edition); 352 (retitled edition) Similar For the New Intellectual, The Romantic Manifesto, Capitalism: The Unknown, Philosophy: Who Needs It, Introduction to Objectivis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution is a 1971 collection of essays by Ayn Rand, in which Rand argues that religion, the New Left, and similar forces are irrational and harmful. Most of the essays originally appeared in The Objectivist. A revised edition appeared in 1975, and an expanded edition edited by Peter Schwartz was published in 1999 under the title Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution.
Contents
Background
The inspiration for collecting these essays into a book came from a reader, who wrote Rand a letter complimenting several of the essays and suggesting she put them out as a book to counteract the influence of the New Left among college students.
Publishing history
The first edition of the book was published by New American Library in 1971, as a paperback under its Signet imprint. A revised edition, adding the essay "The Age of Envy," appeared in 1975.
In 1999, Rand's estate authorized publication of an expanded edition titled Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. It was edited by Peter Schwartz and added a new introduction by Schwartz, as well as two essays by Rand ("Racism" was included in The Virtue of Selfishness, and "Global Balkanization" was in The Voice of Reason) and three by Schwartz ("Gender Tribalism", "The Philosophy of Privation", and "Multicultural Nihilism").
Reception
The book received little attention from reviewers when it was first released. In a survey of Rand's works, historian James T. Baker described the book's essays as "shrill proclamations" that are "more negative than positive more destructive than constructive." Rand bibliographer Mimi Reisel Gladstein said the book's topics "seem dated", but "as Rand's predictions about the negative results of some of the practices she rails against come about, one begins to appreciate the perceptiveness of her logic."