Trisha Shetty (Editor)

Taylor v. United States (2016)

Updated on
Edit
Like
Comment
Share on FacebookTweet on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Reddit
Docket nos.
  
14–6166

Opinion announcement
  
Opinion announcement

End date
  
2016

Citations
  
579 U.S. ___ (more)

Dissent
  
Thomas

Location
  
United States of America

Full case name
  
David Anthony Taylor, Petitioner v. United States

Majority
  
Alito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan

Similar
  
Utah v Strieff, Birchfield v North Dakota, Betterman v Montana, Foster v Chatman, Bank Markazi v Peterson

Taylor v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that in a federal criminal prosecution under the Hobbs Act, the government is not required to prove an interstate commerce element beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court relied on the decision in Gonzales v. Raich which held that Congress has the authority to regulate the marijuana market given that even local activities can have a "substantial effect" on interstate commerce.

Opinion of the Court

Associate Justice Samuel Alito authored the majority opinion.

References

Taylor v. United States (2016) Wikipedia


Similar Topics